Which photographer has the oldest photograph

4-year-old Matthew has a very unusual story.

Matthew is one of a few children that were photographed by an old friend.

When Matthew was eight, Matthew was photographed in a park in the town of Wickenburg, Colorado, a small town about 45 miles (80 kilometers) south of Denver.

The photo was taken by a local photographer named David Ehrhardt.

Ehrhardt is now 95 and has passed away.

This photo of Matthew, taken in Wickenburys backyard, has become an internet sensation.

But what really happened?

What you need to know about photographer David ErshardtFive-year old Matthew has an unusual story 4-years-old Mark has a similar storyThe oldest photograph of Matthew Ehrstad is the photo that caused the internet to explode.

David Ehrstads photo of Mark is a perfect example of what we call photographic chemicals.

Photo chemicals, also known as photo-chromic photographs, can be created by using light sources.

They are created when light is reflected off an object in a photograph.

That light then diffracts and splits and creates a different image.

The light diffracting off Matthew Ersstad’s photo is reflected light.

Because of the diffraction effect, the diffracted light is visible and is called “pink” light.

When the light diffracted off Matthew’s photo diffract, it creates a pinkish hue.

As it diffract’s off Matthew, the image is a very different color.

There are four different color ways for a photo chemical to look, depending on the type of light that is reflected.

The pinkish light of a photo-chemical photo creates a color of its own, called pink.

If you look closely, you can see the diffractor, or reflector, of the light.

This reflector can be anything from a tree branch, to a car, to an old person’s face.

You can also see that the diffractive index of the reflection is the same as the diffusing index.

This is important because it determines the strength of the pink light.

If you have a reflection of 100% pink, that means the reflection will have a diffraction strength of 100%.

If a light source diffract with 100% of its index, the light will have no diffraction index.

The reflection will be completely absorbed.

Picture chemicals are created by the same process.

The only difference is that they create the same image.

For example, the pink and yellow color of the paint in a car can also be created when a light diffuses from the back of a tree trunk, into the trunk.

Now, what caused the Internet to explode?

Matthew and Mark’s photos of Wicker Park were taken on a beautiful summer day in 2016.

A photo of a sunset in the park was taken on July 1, the day of the wedding.

In the picture, Matthew’s father, Robert, is standing by his son.

Robert Ehrstenbach was standing next to his son, Matthew, as they both took their photographs.

Before they were married, Matthew had been working as a photojournalist.

He was also a member of the Wicker Church, which is a large, active church in Colorado Springs.

During the wedding, Robert took a photo of the crowd in front of the church, and Matthew took a photograph of the bride and groom.

After the wedding was over, Matthew returned home to Wickenville and the couple moved in together.

According to Matthew’s mother, Susan Ehrstein, the couple began to photograph each other in the early morning hours.

“I had never seen them together,” Susan said.

Susan told ABC News that she was surprised to see their pictures in the newspapers.

She said that Matthew and Robert did not have a wedding to photograph, and they wanted to share the moment with the world.

ABC News asked the photographer if he had any tips for photographers who were interested in photographing a wedding. 

“Don’t be afraid to get creative.

There’s a lot of magic in taking a picture,” he told ABC.

“Just go with the flow.

You don’t need to be looking at a perfect shot every time.

The sun will just pop out.” 

For more on Matthew and Mark, check out this ABC News report.

Why Ringo Starr: ‘It was a good year’ for the NFL

From a business standpoint, the NFL has been doing pretty well since it was founded in 1946.

But in the eyes of some, it’s been an abysmal year.

Here are some of the biggest problems facing the league today: 1.

The NFL is losing money The NFL has spent $3.8 billion on new stadiums, naming rights deals and other concessions.

The league has also been paying out big cash bonuses to owners over the last three years.

The last major increase in cash compensation was in 2017, when the league paid out $2.8 million to the owners who signed the new collective bargaining agreement.

That money, along with the $1.2 billion in other concessions that the league has been handing out to teams, has caused the league to lose money for each year it has been in operation.

But the league’s problems are not limited to financial.

The Super Bowl was cancelled this past season because of the Superstorm Sandy disaster, and it was not a huge factor in the league, according to sports business analyst Scott C. Jones.

And the NFL’s inability to keep its players is causing major problems.

Jones has said that the NFL needs to make sure it is paying its players, but some are concerned that the salary cap has created a “ponzi scheme.”

“It’s a scheme where the players don’t get paid for what they’re doing,” Jones said.

“The players are getting ripped off.

The players are underpaid, and the owners are underpaying.”

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell says the league is making changes to address the problem.

He told reporters on Tuesday that the players are “doing an amazing job” and that “the players are doing an incredible job.”

“But the NFL, the players and their union are going to need to come together and make this a more sustainable business,” Goodell said.

2.

The new CBA has been a disaster The new NFL CBA will affect the NFL for the next decade.

The rules of the new CAA will not only set the salary caps for each team but also the total amount of money the league can spend on player salaries.

The biggest problem will be the cap on how much money the teams can spend in free agency.

This year, teams are allowed to spend as much as they want on free agents, but the cap is set to rise from $52 million to $57 million.

This will mean that teams will spend far more money in free agent periods, which could lead to teams taking more players in the draft, making the salary-cap system less efficient.

The union is pushing for a cap increase of $50 million this year, but Goodell says that’s too much.

The commissioner is also against the idea of the NFL increasing the cap.

“There are too many loopholes that could be exploited by teams,” Goodell told reporters.

3.

The salary cap was never meant to last A key component of the salary bill for the owners is the “super-rich” who receive a guaranteed minimum salary.

The cap is supposed to be a guarantee that each team will spend at least $150 million in a given year.

But that guarantee has been pushed into the stratosphere, especially in the past few years.

A big reason for this is because the owners of NFL franchises are not bound by the salary limits.

For example, if a team signs a player who is on the roster but has not been released, the team can continue to sign the player.

But if a player is released and another team signs him, the former team will have to pay the former player’s salary, even if it is less than the maximum salary the team will pay the new player.

This has led to a system where teams can sign players who are on the field and still make money.

A rule change to the CBA would allow teams to sign players at the same time as releasing them, allowing the league and owners to keep the salary limit even when the new contract is signed.

However, that could create more problems if other teams were to sign other players with the same contract, which is a possible outcome of a rule change.

4.

There are only 10 owners per team.

This is bad for the game It has been rumored that the owners, not the owners themselves, make the decision about who gets paid what.

In fact, it was former Colts owner Jim Irsay who was blamed for the lack of transparency in the salary structure in the early days of the league.

Irs, who was fired by the Colts after the 2016 season, said at a time when it was still unclear if the new contracts were in place, that the “owners, not me, decide how much to spend.”

That comment caused a rift in the Colts organization, which ultimately led to the firing of Irs.

The owners, in turn, have been working to fix the system, which they claim is a result of a